On this page I will describe the various components and systems of the design behind "Project Licht 'n Stein". While I am converting this page from its original version from 2002 (when most of the concepts were merely ideas), please excuse the "mess".
Almost all of the design components (except cooking) require either no energy or use energy that comes from a renewable source like solar, wind, and the rain.
Read on to learn more about how this house is heated and cooled, where the fresh water comes from, how cooking and washing is accomplished, how electricity is generated and stored and what this house has to offer for entertainment.
At the end of this page you'll also find a description of the thinking that went into the design of the floor plan and its shell.
Obviously when you design a house for year-round living in southeastern Minnesota you are concerned about heating. Winters, even with any real or perceived global climate change, are pretty darn cold and pretty long (a snowflake falling on the ground on Thanksgiving might not thaw until early March).
Thus three different heating systems were incorporated into the design of the house: passive solar, a wood-fired masonry stove and radiant in-floor heating heated by the sun and a wood stove.
But the best way to heat the house is actually to to keep the demand low - and I don't mean putting on a second layer of your uncle's Norwegian sweaters and moving into a one room cottage. No, the solution lies in keeping the heated area "compact" and providing as much insulation as possible.
Passive Solar, i.e., the heating of the living space just with sunshine and no mechanical or electrical means (hence the term passive) satisfies about 40-60% of the annual heating needs.
To make passive solar work, the following four components are needed: orientation, glazing, heat storage, and an overhang.
Our current design really does not allow us to put any more glazing on the south side. Based on some percentages we read in one of the standard books, we probably do not have enough glazing for the whole main floor, though the glazing amount just feels right and I am much more concerned about overheating (and the heat loss associated with many windows) than underheating. Incidentally my parents in Germany have radiant floor heating (since 1978) and are tremendously happy with it. To my knowledge there have been no problems with the system or the hoses in now over 25 years.
Currently I plan on putting radiant floor heat in every room except the pantry (I'll probably just heat the space in front of the wardrobe by means of the connection between the bathroom and the kitchen).
In the basement all rooms except I plan on putting it in the music studio, movie room, animal den and garden tools (and maybe a few pipes through the storage area).
On the 2nd floor probably only the two bathrooms will get radiant floor heat - the passive heat "sucked up" through the . On the other hand I'll probably run a little calculation to calculate the additional cost of the two bedrooms...at least then I have the option to do hook them into the system later...
One of the areas that I haven't addressed yet is how to get the hot water from the basement to the 2nd floor...that is quite a rise and requires a pump with a "high-head". Maybe a 2nd warm water reservoir with heat exchanger in the attic space could be the solution.
We plan on having the masonry stove built by "Gimme Shelter Construction " a company located in central Wisconsin that builds masonry stoves designed by a guy from Toronto, Canada.
I define passive cooling as any means that avoid over-heating of the house that do not require any energy or active maintenance.
Active Cooling on the other hand requires a certain amount of energy (even if it's just me getting my rear end of the chair to lower the blinds or open a window). We will not employ any means of cooling that require large amounts of electrical energy, such as an air conditioner. In our current house, built in 1890, we have been very comfortable during the past 3 summers except for maybe two or three days.
During our initial research of the "total cost of ownership" prior to us making an offer to buy the land, we obtained an estimate of about $22k for drilling a 550-600 ft. deep well (165-180 m). This, and the fact that our friends Sarah & Kirby as well as the folks at Dream Acres are living quite comfortably with rain water collection, provided enough incentive for us to consider using rain water as our only source for drinking water -- including water toilets and showers. Besides, as with many aspects with our project, we wanted to go back to basic methods of sustainable and environmentally living and learn how to live comfortably within the constraints that nature provides us.
But the cost and "learning experience" were not the only factors. In addition to those benefits, rainwater is softer because it contains less minerals (as it has not sickered through hundreds of soil layers). Whether it contains less pesticides and herbicides remains to be seen (and tested). At a recent Dinner on the Bluff series event, we learned that even in Minneapolis the lakes are already poisoned with pesticides that are otherwise only found in rural areas. Further tests revealed that they had gotten there through...the rain. (see "Filtering" below).
The floor area (inside measures) is 36' 8" by 38' 8". The width of the walls will be 11" and the overhangs are as follows: East & West 2' 9"; South 3' 6" and to the north the "drive-through" overhang of 14'. This provides a roof area of 44' x 58' (13.4 m by 17.7 m) or 2,552 sq.ft. (237 m2) that will yield approx. 1,430 gal of water per inch of rainfall at 90% yield (you can use google to ask: "44 * 58 / 12 * 0.90) cu ft in gal"). At an annual average of 40 inches of rain for the Rochester area, this yields about 57,200 gallons a year or 156 gallons (594 l) a day. Even in a dry year with 24 inches, that is still 94 gallons (355 l) a day.
The following table summarizes all calculations:
The dimensioning of our storage capacity was influenced by multiple factors.
As the above calculations showed, a single 2-3 inch rainfall can yield almost 4,000 gallons of water -- or about two-thirds or our storage capacity. So it is definitely thinkable and likely that we might have days where our cisterns are at capacity, at which point we better had thought of a way to divert the water (notwithstanding the option of taking some long showers or big bubble-baths).
At this point I have not completely thought through the best way. Maybe we'll put up some additional outside storage tanks under the deck to collect water for watering the garden. But ultimately we have to route the water away from the house (I don't think it would be good to flood our septic system).
The other extreme case (for the quality-inclined out there: I'm testing the boundary conditions ;-) is when to run completely out of water, which most likely would happen during the winter. E.g., if the last rainfall (that filled up our cisterns) was on December 6, we could run out of water by February 24, after 80 days, if we use an average of 75 gallons per day. To accomodate this scenario we need to add a "frost-free" filling pipe accessible from the outside (or, I was just thinking, maybe from within the garage). Then we can either get a milk or fire truck to bring some water or get one of those "truck bed tanks" to haul some water ourselves.
We initially started our house design by trying to come up with a space-efficient design that still provides comfort. Although we haven't read her book, you could say that we designed a "not-so-big house". Interestingly enough I just found out in an interview, that Susan is originally from the other side of th Atlantic (Britain) and also resides in Minnesota. I'm sure she'd have a few tricks up her sleeve to improve on our design, but for now we're quite happy. Anyway, I digress.
We quickly settled on a 36 by 24 foot (10.8 x 7.2 meters) floorplan for the main floor that included the living/dining area, a bathroom, kitchen, pantry, and an extra room for an office/library. To minimize space (but without sacrificing comfort) we had intended to have the garage in the basement (I definitely wanted an attached garage from which you could enter the house [for those of you wondering whether that isn't the definition of an attached garage I should mention that my father and I added an attached garage to our house in Germany, and though a garage wall and a house wall are attached to each other, you still need to walk into the house from the outside). During our initial review of the floor plan with our General Contractor, Andy Bunge, he shared a story of how he had designed his house as well as a duplex he just built in 2003 to be handicap accessible, because "you never know". So we took Andy's advice and went through a fairly extensive re-design that made all doors on the main floor 3 feet wide, the bathroom big enough to have a five-foot radius between sink, toilet, and bathtub, and the garage moved to the mainfloor (increasing our main floor size from 36 by 24 to 36 by 38 (10.8 m x 11.4 m).
Actually to move the garage up to the main floor had its advantages: it eliminated the need for excavation, potential retaining walls (although with the landscape given, we could have made it work) and the risk of having water run into the garage. Secondly we now have a nice, warm, 14 foot buffer to the north side of the main living space (which also nixed any attempt to put in windows on the north side ;-) that shields us nicely from the cold and from the frosty north winds. Thirdly we were able to gain a few feet for the upstairs rooms, thus deflating the somewhat tight spaces. A fourth advantage is the added roof space of at least 575 sq.ft. that gives us a gallon of water more per day per each inch annual rainfall (40 gal/day for 40 in./year). And lastly, although somewhat unnecessary, it added a nice 480 sq.ft. to the basement, making enough room for the water tanks, the movie room, and room for a potential future music studio.
In the next paragraphs I'll try to describe our thinking behind the design of some of the rooms of our floor plan. The order in which things are described in here follows loosely the order in which the pictures are sorted in the corresponding photo album. Feel free to browse the pictures in parallel to reading the following paragraphs. Some descriptions might make more sense with the picture in mind.
The first thing that most people notice (besides the somwehat dramatic deck design) is that the living/dining room is very open and spacious. Obviously this is a direct result from our primary heating source, passive solar energy. Our glazing on the south-side takes up 24 ft of the 36 feet wall. But we are also lucky to be able to build in a spot where we have almost absolute privacy and do not have to be concerned about "exposure" or living in a fish bowl. Obviously this design would work less well in "suburbia" unless one would employ curtains.
On the north side you'll notice a large (14 foot) overhang that serves as additional rain water collection surface, shelter for firewood, and is a drive-through for accessing the west-facing garage entrance (see next section).
You'll also notice the roof's overhang, shielding the siding from the elements and especially on the south side, providing sufficient shading in the summer time (when the sun stands high in the sky during the day) to avoid overheating of the heavily glazed living room.
Another feature visible from the outside is the design of the "drive-through garage". This idea originated with the garage my father designed and built at their house in Germany. Albeit with the size of European cars, and the lack of space (my parents' fifth-of-an-acre lot on top of a landfill cost $100,000 in the mid 1970s...), my father could get by with an overall length of 8 or 9 meters (27-29.5 feet) and only one garage door; we played the "switching cars game" quite often. Originally we had only planned a "one car" garage which would have resulted in an L-shape floor plan. As I was "building" the walls in the 3D modeling program, however, I realized how unnecessarily complicated it would become to construct such a floorplan (including a much more complex roof line).Which then led me to the "drive-through" garage design with a door on either side.
For the time being we will use the garage for our pickup truck (which, according to our calculation uses approx. 30 mpg/per person since we mostly commute together at least 70% of the time) and for the tractor (a Kubota BX2230 - highly recommended). But the garage, at a length of 36' 8" (11.2 m), is now actually big enough for the truck plus a mid-size sedan.
The Garage also serves as our personal main entrance door, thus eliminating an often unused feature of houses, where most people enter the house through the backdoor. Besides the two garage doors on the east and west side, we added a regular door on the north side, a little off-center. This door will serve as a back-up entry and mainly in the winter as an access door to carry the firew wood inside from the north roof-overhang.
With a 2,000 ft (610 m) driveway that climbs about 300 feet (90 m), we're unlikely
Some of the more or less intentional unique design concepts include:
The biggest design challenge was to fit in the stairs from main floor to the basement. The stairs